Want to beat climate change? Protect our natural forests.

Author: No Comments Share:

Kate Dooley University of Melbourne.
Brendan Mackey Griffith University.

A special report on how land use affects climate change was released in August by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Land degradation, deforestation, and the expansion of our deserts, along with agriculture and the other ways people shape land, are all major contributors to global climate change.

Conversely, trees remove carbon dioxide and store it safely in their trunks, roots and branches. Research published in July estimated that planting a trillion trees could be a powerful tool against climate change.


Our cities need additional trees, but some commonly planted ones won’t survive climate change.


However, planting new trees as a climate action pales in comparison to protecting existing forests. Restoring degraded forests and expanding them by 350 million hectares will store an amount of carbon comparable to 900 million hectares of new trees.

Natural climate solutions

Using ecological mechanisms for reducing and storing carbon is a growing field of study. Broadly known as natural climate solutions, carbon can be stored in wetlands, grasslands, natural forests, and agriculture.

This is called sequestration, and the more diverse and longer-lived the ecosystem, the more it mitigates the effect of climate change.

Allowing trees to regenerate naturally is a more effective, immediate, and low-cost method of removing and storing atmospheric carbon than planting new trees. Shutterstock.

Research has estimated that these natural carbon sinks can provide 37% of the CO₂ reduction needed to keep the rise in global temperatures below 2℃.

But this research can be wrongly interpreted to imply that the priority is to plant young trees. In fact, the major climate solution is the protection and recovery of carbon-rich and long-lived ecosystems, especially natural forests.


Extreme weather caused by climate change has damaged 45% of Australia’s coastal habitat.


With the release of the new IPCC report imminent, now is a good time to prioritise the protection and recovery of existing ecosystems over planting trees.

Forest ecosystems (including the soil) store more carbon than the atmosphere. Their loss would trigger emissions which would exceed the remaining carbon budget for limiting global warming to less than the 2℃ above pre-industrial levels, let alone 1.5℃, threshold.


40 years ago, scientists predicted climate change. And, hey, they were right.


Natural forest systems, with their rich and complex biodiversity – products of ecological and evolutionary processes – are stable, resilient, great at adapting to changing conditions, and store more carbon than young, degraded, or plantation forests.

Protect existing trees

Forest degradation is caused by selective logging, temporary clearing, and other human land use. In some areas, emissions from degradation can exceed those of deforestation. Once damaged, natural ecosystems are vulnerable to drought, fires, and climate change.

Recently published research found helping natural forest regrow can have a globally significant effect on carbon dioxide levels. This approach – called proforestation – is a more effective, immediate, and low-cost method than tree planting for removing and storing atmospheric carbon in the long term. And it can be used across many different kinds of forests around the world.

Avoiding further loss and degradation of primary forests and intact forest landscapes, and allowing degraded forests to regrow naturally, would reduce global carbon emissions. Shutterstock.

Avoiding further loss and degradation of primary forests and intact forest landscapes, and allowing degraded forests to naturally regrow, would reduce global carbon emissions annually by about 1 gigatonnes (Gt), and reduce another 2-4 Gt of carbon emissions, just through natural regrowth.


Not everyone cares about climate change, but reproach won’t change their minds.


Research has predicted that protecting primary forests while allowing degraded forests to recover, along with limited expansion of natural forests, would remove 153 billion tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere between now and 2150.

Every country with forests can contribute to this effort. In fact, research shows that community land management is the best way to improve natural forests and help trees recover from degradation.

By the numbers

Tree planting carries limited climate benefits. The recent Science paper focused on mapping and quantifying increases in tree canopy cover in areas which support trees naturally. However, increasing canopy cover through natural forest regeneration can sequester 40 times more carbon over the course of the century than establishing new plantations.


Google searches reveal where people are most concerned about climate change.


We need to think very carefully about how we use land which has already been cleared: land is a finite resource, and we need to grow food and resources for a global population set to hit 9 billion by 2050.

We need to understand land as a finite resource and accomodate a global population set to hit 9 billion by 2050. Shutterstock.

Any expansion of natural forest area is best achieved through allowing degraded forests to recover naturally. Allowing trees to regenerate naturally, using nearby remnants of primary forests and seed banks in the soil of recently cleared forests, is more likely to result in a resilient and diverse forest than planting massive numbers of seedlings.

Instead of planting entirely new areas, we should prioritise reconnecting forested areas, and restoring the edges of forests to protect their mature core. This will increase the resilience and durability of our carbon-storing forests.


2,000 years of records show it’s becoming hot more quickly than before.


For forests to help avert dangerous climate change effectively, global and regional policies are needed to protect, restore, and regenerate natural forests, alongside a carbon-zero energy economy.


A version of this article was co-published with Pursuit.
Kate Dooley Research Fellow Climate & Energy College University of Melbourne, and Brendan Mackey Director of the Griffith Climate Change Response Program Griffith University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Previous Article

It’ll be hard, but we can feed the world with plant protein.

Next Article

Why the Amazon fires strike dread in our hearts.

You may also like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *