Tim Woodruff. Amid Covid 19, the powerless suffer, & the powerful carry on.

Author: Share:
Covid-19 presents us with an opportunity: increased equality in society, resilient to the challenges ahead, or a society ruled by power imbalances, struggling to cope with natural and man-made disasters.

Pre-Covid

Thirty years ago, it was demonstrated that, in an environment in which access to health care was equitable, health outcomes were determined by position in the social hierarchy. Power over one’s life determined the age of one’s demise (Marmot). Eleven years ago, it was demonstrated that, in wealthy countries like Australia, health and social outcomes correlated strongly with relative income, a gradient of power against health (Wilkinson and Pickett, The Spirit Level Slide 7).

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality & Safety has released its Interim Report, pointedly and appropriately titled Neglect. It states :

Many of the cases of deficiencies or outright failings in aged care were known before coming to public attention both to the providers concerned and to the regulators. Why has so little been done to address these deficiencies?

The Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System has released its Interim Report. It states “

Poor mental health has become a pressing yet ignored health crisis. Mental health services continue to fail to provide treatment, care, and support to people living with mental illness, their families, and their carers.

The powerless suffer. The powerful carry on.

According to the Australian Newspaper of 19 June 19 2020, the Australian Building & Construction Commission’s audit of labour hire firms found that eighty percent were not complying with workplace laws by not paying workers correctly, not keeping proper records, and not giving their workers payslips. Profitable companies using such firms pretend they don’t know how their business world works.

Underpayment of low-paid workers is regularly and repeatedly exposed, thanks mainly to unions, the ABC, and Fairfax media. Once again, the regulators are asleep, lacking resources, or in the pockets of the powerful.

The powerless suffer. The powerful carry on.

Fortunately for the powerless, we do have a welfare system. It was the most highly targeted system in the OECD in 2011. Targeting has increased, including through the failed and now ceased ‘Robo-debt’. Even before that, applying for welfare and complying with requirements was a huge challenge for many, whether because of mental health issues, physical illness, language and cultural issues, or lack of access to or knowledge of computers. It is disempowering, demeaning, and demoralising.

The underlying principles guiding welfare for several decades have been targeting, mutual obligation, a poverty-level income to encourage work engagement, and minimising costs. The Federal Government is now adopting an ‘investment approach’ to welfare, which would see targeting resources to those most likely to benefit in the short term. But there is no talk of the long-term adequacy of the payments, and little heed given to the complexities which citizens must negotiate. Under the ‘investment approach’, the powerless remain so unless they belong to a group which can be shown to respond rapidly to some targeted resources.

Enter Covid

Nik Anderson. flickr cc.

Into this power and income imbalance charges Covid-19. As one might expect, it hits the powerless hardest, the aged in residential aged care, the poor in crowded labour hire firm-arranged accommodation or workplaces in which it is almost impossible to maintain physical distancing, and the poor in inadequately serviced crowded housing commission accommodation. But the virus has no respect for class, power, or income.

So we see a response from the powerful, an immediate appreciation that, if one gives an unemployed person an adequate small income, the money will all return to the economy immediately. It is a government stimulus as recession hits. Finally, some minimal consideration has been given to those desperate people wanting to feed their families and themselves, while supposedly self-isolating or being tested. The realities of relatively powerless people’s lives are belatedly being partly recognised.

Blame for the unfolding Covid-19 pandemic in Australia has been everywhere. Minimally trained and supported security guards were employed in quarantine hotels, employed in a poorly regulated industry in which the firm was chosen without tender by the Victorian Government. But blame is productive only when it helps policymakers look at the system failures which lead to problems. Hospitals have understood this for years. They avoid blame when a medical disaster occurs. The question asked is not “Who is to blame?”, but rather “what kind of a system with appropriate checks and balances should we have in place to prevent a disaster, knowing that individuals make mistakes, and that individuals who already feel powerless may make more mistakes?”.

Health has rightly been the major focus. But the economy is also crucial. The Federal Government has made a series of extraordinary decisions. With the full knowledge that those most impacted financially were women and young people, it decided to reduce childcare support, and plan a reduction to job-keeper and job-seeker payments. It appointed a team primarily of corporate directors to lead the job creation advice in secret. There remains minimal representation from those involved in providing public services. It is keen to deregulate private industry further, while ignoring the fact that poorly regulated private industry is part of the problem.

It has introduced a financial incentive to pursue their dreams for those with enough money already to have plans for home building. It is considering bringing forward the legislated tax cuts which will see those earning between $22,000 and $30,000 a year receiving $55 extra a year, and those earning more than $100,000 receiving $2560 a year. High income earners invest in their own future, whether it is shares or another negatively-geared property. They have no need to spend it in the productive economy, the one that will drag us up from the recession. The decisions ignore the reality that those on low income spend every cent every week.

The Covid opportunity

The opportunity to spend is now present. If we can even consider tax cuts for those who don’t need them, we can definitely afford to spend now on residential aged care with increased mandatory staffing levels. We can easily afford increased spending on public mental health care. We don’t need to wait for recommendations from Royal Commissions to initiate such spending. We can resource vigorous regulation of labour hire firms and employers in general to minimise underpayments.

Such measures create jobs and target the powerless. Their health improves. They are then likely to become employed. Adequate income support to those on low incomes will mean that those most affected by the recession are the ones likely to benefit. Every cent will be spent rebuilding the economy immediately.

This is an opportunity to look at the power imbalances in the structure of our society. It is a health issue. Politicians are the ones charged with responsibility for all the problems outlined previously. They have clearly been captive to powerful industry and/or their own interests as they have let this situation evolve. Many mean well, but the structures of which they are a part limit any well-meaning resolve, such that, despite these issues being discussed for years, the power imbalance remains, and the effects on people’s lives are shocking. ‘Neglect’ describes it well. Where are the leaders?

Tim Woodruff is President of the Doctors Reform Society, an organisation of doctors and medical students promoting measures to improve health for all, in a socially just and equitable way.
Republished with permission from Pearls & Irritations 30 July.

Photo Covid-19. Prachatai. flickr cc.

30 July 2020

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Previous Article

Peter Whiting Editorial. Enabling people to flourish after Covid-19.

Next Article

Ray Bricknell. Poverty is a policy choice, made for the poor by the affluent.

You may also like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.